Hyeon Chung vs Jason Murray Kubler Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 18 Apr at 05:24 AM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

H. Chung vs J. Murray Kubler

Hyeon Chung
Hyeon Chung

Flag KOR KOR

l
w
l
w
l
l
l
w
l
l
Jason Murray Kubler
Jason Murray Kubler

Flag AUS AUS

l
l
l
l
l
w
w
w
l
w

0

Win

1

Played

1

Win

29
Age
32
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
5'10" (178 cm)
371
C. Rank
188
19
Best Rank
63
1
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$2.5M
Career Money
$1.3M
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Chung 0 - 1 Kubler

They have played 2 sets in total, with Hyeon Chung winning 0 and Jason Murray Kubler winning 2. The last match between Jason Murray Kubler and Hyeon Chung was at the Busan Challenger, 18-04-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Jason Murray Kubler getting the victory 6-2 6-4.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Chung0
Kubler1
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(QFBusan Challenger(04-18-25)

Hard
AUS Flag
Jason Murray Kubler
6
6
KOR Flag
Hyeon Chung
2
4

H. Chung vs J. M. Kubler H2H Profile

Stats
$2,529,406Career Prize Money$1,257,590
64.29% (288-160)Career Total W/L67.21% (453-221)
0Hard1
17Titles25
0Total H2H Matches1
50.00% (1-1)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

H. Chung vs J. M. Kubler Match Preview:

When diving into the intricacies of second serve performance over the past six months, the numbers tell an enlightening story. Could it be that the percentage of points won on second serves holds the key to predicting match outcomes? Take Chung and Kubler, for instance. Chung has clinched 39.92% of points on their second serve, while Kubler edges ahead with 46.24%. The significance of these figures is high, as they have been known to closely forecast match results.

Switching gears to return game statistics, we delve into who might have the upper hand in breaking their opponent's serve. Here, Chung has secured 45.15% of their competitor's second serve points recently, with Kubler again narrowly surpassing at 45.37%. However, the first serve return statistics add an interesting twist. Chung thrives by winning 30.17% of their opponent's first serve points, while Kubler lags with 21.38%. This disparity might just tilt the balance of this head-to-head encounter.

How does facing pressure impact these players? Chung has managed to save 45.45% of breakpoints, yet Kubler proves more resilient, saving 56.3%. These statistics could be incredibly useful for in-game betting strategies. Both players have impressive match records over the past year; Chung has triumphed in 75% of their matches, whereas Kubler edges out with a 77.14% success rate. Predicting outcomes often revolves around these holistic views of player performance.

Surface preferences further reveal interesting dimensions. Chung excels on Hard courts, boasting a 70% win rate, but struggles on Grass. Meanwhile, Kubler demonstrates prowess on Clay with a 70% success rate and finds Indoor Hard courts less favorable. Surface compatibility often influences match predictions, potentially affecting player confidence and game strategy.

Evaluating player level illuminates where each player stands in the competitive hierarchy. Over the past year, Chung has showcased their skills predominantly in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, achieving a 77.42% win rate. Kubler, competing mainly at the same level, leads with an 83.33% win rate. Comparing their standings against opponent quality reveals Chung facing competitors with an average rank of 259.14, while Kubler's adversaries rank at 227.83 on average. Such insights are crucial to estimate who might be the titular favorite.

In scenarios extending to deciding sets, prediction enthusiasts might be swayed by recent stats. Chung has clinched 44% of these intense final sets, narrowly besting Kubler, who has a 43% success rate in similar situations. Moreover, past performances in current events should never be overlooked, as they often reveal players' momentum and adaptability. Finally, analyzing break point conversion, Chung presents a strength by converting 33.12% of opportunities, slightly outperforming Kubler's 29.31% efficiency.

In light of these in-depth comparisons and critical statistics, Kubler emerges as the potential victor in this matchup. Their marginally stronger second serve performance, ability to save breakpoints, and slightly higher overall match-winning percentage provide a compelling prediction in favor of their triumph.

Hyeon Chung vs Jason Murray Kubler Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

H. Chung vs J. M. Kubler H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
0H2H Matches Won1
0Sets Won2
6Games Won12
0Aces (Total)7
9Total Double Faults3
1:38:1Average Match Time1:38:1
56% (38/68)1st Serve %51% (26/51)
63% (24/38)1st Serve Win %85% (22/26)
37% (11/30)2nd Serve Win %60% (15/25)
33% (1/3)Break Pts Won %36% (4/11)
27% (14/51)Return Points Win %49% (33/68)
0% (0/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)1st Set Won, Won Match100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Chung 49%, Kubler 52%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Chung 56%, Kubler 52%.
Break Points Saved %: Chung 58%, Kubler 63%.

H. Chung Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardYokohama Challenger - 17-11-2025

R1

JPNK. Uchida
L
6-3 6-0
I.hardKobe Challenger - 10-11-2025

R2

TPEC. Hsin
L
1-6 6-2 7-5

R1

JPNR. Matsuda
W
6-1 6-4
HardMatsuyama Challenger - 03-11-2025

R1

AUSP. Sekulic
L
6-4 6-3
HardSeoul Challenger - 27-10-2025

R1

HKGC. Lam
L
6-3 6-2

J. M. Kubler Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardPlayford Challenger - 24-11-2025

R1

AUSL. Tu
W
6-3 6-3
HardSydney Challenger - 17-11-2025

SF

AUSJ. Duckworth
L
7-5 6-2

QF

AUSA. Bolt
W
7-5 6-3

R2

CZEM. Gengel
W
6-4 6-2

R1

AUSP. Marinkov
W
6-3 1-6 6-2
banner

H. Chung vs J. M. Kubler Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
64.29% (288/160)YTD Win/Loss67.21% (453/221)
61.55% (661/413)Sets Win/Loss64.05% (1005/564)
54.73% (5369/4441)Games Win/Loss55.24% (8146/6600)
67.15% (233/114)Hard Win/Loss65.48% (165/87)
58.82% (30/21)Clay Win/Loss70.14% (249/106)
57.50% (23/17)Indoor Hard W/L37.50% (6/10)
20.00% (2/8)Grass Win/Loss64.71% (33/18)
0.26Aces Per Game0.31
1235Aces Total2231
0.24Double Faults Per Game0.26
1156Total Double Faults1856
1:25:2Average Match Time1:10:17
537.81Average Opponent Rank517.1
62% (16020/25756)1st Serve %61% (19734/32114)
70% (11219/16020)1st Serve Win %72% (14122/19734)
50% (4914/9736)2nd Serve Win %51% (6275/12379)
45% (1300/2914)Break Points Won % (Total)44% (1452/3308)
42% (11149/26853)Return Points Win %40% (13002/32418)
57.89% (22/16)Slam W/L51.92% (27/25)
51.52% (17/16)Masters W/L38.46% (5/8)
78.57% (11/3)Cups W/L50.00% (1/1)
55.66% (59/47)Main Tour W/L47.06% (24/27)
65.22% (105/56)Challenger W/L66.41% (170/86)
77.08% (74/22)Futures W/L75.33% (226/74)
64% (257/402)Best of 3 Sets Win %69% (434/633)
68% (28/41)Best of 5 Sets Win %48% (15/31)
51% (68/133)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)55% (113/205)
56% (69/123)Deciding Set Win %57% (108/189)
87% (287/249)1st Set Won, Won Match91% (432/391)
13% (287/38)1st Set Won, Lost Match9% (432/38)
24% (161/39)1st Set Lost, Won Match25% (242/61)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Thu, 27 Nov, 02:30 AM
Prediction
AUSP. MarinkovLL
AUSA. Bolt4
W1
4.85
W2
1.134
Wed, 26 Nov, 07:30 PM
Prediction
USAM. Mckennon
ARGF. Mena
W1
4.55
W2
1.154
Thu, 27 Nov, 05:00 PM
Prediction
CHID. A. NunezWC
ARGF. A. Gomez
W1
3.72
W2
1.222
Wed, 26 Nov, 10:00 AM
Prediction
FINE. Vasa
RUSI. Simakin2
W1
2.76
W2
1.38
Wed, 26 Nov, 11:30 AM
Prediction
CYPM. EfstathiouWC
ESPS. C. HernandoALT
W1
3.2
W2
1.29
Thu, 27 Nov, 11:30 AM
Prediction
ITAE. D. Valle
CIVE. Coulibaly5
W1
2.24
W2
1.56